Alieva, N.F. 1992, "Malay and Cham Possession Compared", in Oceanic Linguistics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 13--21. University of Hawai'i Press.
Alieva, N.F. (1992). Malay and Cham Possession Compared. Oceanic Linguistics, 31 (1) , 13--21. University of Hawai'i Press.
Alieva, Natalia F. 1992. "Malay and Cham Possession Compared." In Oceanic Linguistics, 31 , no. 1: 13--21. University of Hawai'i Press.
Alieva, Natalia F. "Malay and Cham Possession Compared." Oceanic Linguistics. 31.1 (1992): 13--21.
Citation within the text:
(Alieva 1992)
Save reference in Zotero
  source = {jstor},
  ISSN = {0029-8115},
  abstract = {Although possession is a fundamental and universal semantic relation, many languages lack an original lexeme 'to have'. Existing lexemes with this meaning are of late formation, and the original clause models for rendering possession do not include such a verbal predicate. Indonesian, representative of many Austronesian languages, is of this type. The highly analytic Cham language, a member of the Austronesian Chamic group in Indochina, has a special lexeme hu 'to have, to be', which is frequently used both as a full predicate and as a grammatical particle. In this respect it is different from many Austronesian languages and similar to other noncognate analytic languages of Indochina.},
  author = {Alieva, Natalia F.},
  copyright = {Copyright 1992 University of Hawai'i Press},
  journal = {Oceanic Linguistics},
  jstor_articletype = {Full Length Article},
  jstor_date = {199222},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Summer, 1992},
  number = {1},
  pages = {13--21},
  publisher = {University of Hawai'i Press},
  title = {Malay and Cham Possession Compared},
  url = {http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0029-8115%28199222%2931%3A1%3C13%3AMACPC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G},
  volume = {31},
  year = {1992},